<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Secularism Coherent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephanfowler.com/2009/06/secularism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephanfowler.com/2009/06/secularism/</link>
	<description>By Stephan Fowler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Types of Tolerance &#124; The Sleepwalk of the West</title>
		<link>http://stephanfowler.com/2009/06/secularism/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Types of Tolerance &#124; The Sleepwalk of the West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephanfowler.com/?p=492#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] I am pessimistic about secularism, given humans&#8217; hard-wired need for faith. So, in this extremis, I believe that being actively [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am pessimistic about secularism, given humans&#8217; hard-wired need for faith. So, in this extremis, I believe that being actively [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleeping Gods &#124; Stephan Powys</title>
		<link>http://stephanfowler.com/2009/06/secularism/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleeping Gods &#124; Stephan Powys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephanfowler.com/?p=492#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] result: a huge step back from secularism &#8211; the weakness of which is its reliance on the good will of everyone, including&#8230; fundamentalists.   No Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] result: a huge step back from secularism &#8211; the weakness of which is its reliance on the good will of everyone, including&#8230; fundamentalists.   No Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahzi</title>
		<link>http://stephanfowler.com/2009/06/secularism/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephanfowler.com/?p=492#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Secularism is perfectly coherent to the believer. All you need to do is ask them, &quot;Would you be happy with an Islamic government?&quot;

Unless they&#039;re Islamic, in which case you ask them if they would be happy with a Jewish government.

The target realization is that a secular, godless government, however distasteful, is still more acceptable than any _other_ religious government. And poof! You have yourself a died-in-the-wool secularist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secularism is perfectly coherent to the believer. All you need to do is ask them, &#8220;Would you be happy with an Islamic government?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless they&#8217;re Islamic, in which case you ask them if they would be happy with a Jewish government.</p>
<p>The target realization is that a secular, godless government, however distasteful, is still more acceptable than any _other_ religious government. And poof! You have yourself a died-in-the-wool secularist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
